It just wouldn't, and you are very naive to think so.īecause unless you can put the entire material base underground, most important of all, you don't have energy source underground, power station are going to be destroyed, and all the circuitries will also be destroyed by EMP. If US and Russia started nuclear exchange, it will be a mixture of Ground Brust, Air Burst and EMP attack and also Atmospheric attack, the destruction WILL BE COMPLEHENSIVE, this would cover a large range of issue that did not present itself in both Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Also, if US and Russia start a nuclear war, that will not be an airdrop airburst only like the US did with the sole purpose of letting Japan know the power instead of trying to go for total annihilation. Second, as I said before Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not comparable into a global nuclear warfare, you are comparing a 50kilo ton bomb dropped in 1945 to a post 2000 multi-megaton drop.

Many military analyses believe the war will continue as both the government and the original reason for war continue to exist until either the civilian population overthrow any of the government or its descent into anarchism If we have only 500 million survivors after the nuclear war, we can use it for 20 years.įirst of all, there will still be a conventional war after the nuclear exchange, just because you go nuclear, that does not mean the war stop immediately over. According to the food consumption rate of 1.4 billion people in India (the annual food consumption in India is less than 30% of that in China), it can be used for 7 years. According to the normal grain consumption rate of 1.4 billion people in China, it can be used for two years. This should be able to restore the scientific, technological and industrial level of mankind in a relatively short time.Ĭyanobacteria can be used in aquaculture, and we can raise animals to provide other nutrients.Ĭhina has more than 50% of global grain reserves. After the nuclear war, China should be able to retain most of its industrial nodes. Many large Chinese enterprises have underground warehouses and underground factories. After the nuclear war, the time for the earth to repair itself was not as long as we thought. At least the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have not left their homes, nor have there been major radiation accidents. If not, then you will suffer from something called Malnutrition, and that is fatal unless you regain the balance of that diet.ĭon't ask dumb question please, we can eat grass, does that mean we can sustain life just by eating grass?Ĭlick to expand.I mentioned Hiroshima and Nagasaki just to prove that the radiation residues of nuclear weapons are not as terrible as nuclear power station accidents. That include, Carbohydrate, Protein, Mineral (such as Zinc and Vitamin), Fats, Fibre and etc, does cyanobacteria have Carbohydrate? Does cyanobacteria have Protein? (probably it does) Does cyanobacteria have Fat? Does cyanobacteria have Fibre?

I have said it many times.ĭude, did you study biology at all? Humans need a balance diet of multiple nutrients in order to sustain Sustagen. I personally don't think Ukrainian war will develop into a nuclear war. This is a hypothetical situation on what happened after a nuclear war between US and Russia. Just because Japan can build back Nagasaki and Hiroshima after they dropped 2 50kt bombs on it does not mean the world can build back after US and Russia both unloaded 1000 Megaton of nuclear material on it. You can still produce stuff in parts that were affected back in Nagasaki and Hiroshima, like in Tokyo but who can produce stuff when the entire world is destroyed? All the farm field were burned and irradiated, and all the livestock on the surface of the earth killed? It is NOT the same case if we are talking about Global Thermonuclear War, if Russia or China have a nuclear exchange, the ENTIRE world is going to be razed. Nor were Japan completely destroyed, nor the world was completely destroyed. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not a complete destruction.

Nuclear throne water level